The world we inhabit has a male principle and a female principle. The male and female are ubiquitous in nature. There is also the category of hermaphrodite which carries the attributes of both; this category includes most species of plants, snails and some very few fish species but rarely humans. The word hermaphrodite derives from Greek myth where the goddess Aphrodite (Venus) and god Hermes (Mercury) produced a son called hermaphrodites who later while swimming merged with a nymph enamoured by his beauty and came to have the attributes of both male and female.
Nature was never satisfied with simple monotonous cellular division of amoebas as a means of reproduction. Procreation by cloning was only the first step. Nature’s profound inner-most urge is to create variation. This is not merely on account of an aesthetic compulsion but arises from the very instinct of survival. Survival may be ensured through the artifice of variation not merely of a species but equally within the species. No two faces must be alike no two finger prints. A bi-polar sexuality ensures that genes will be so shuffled each time that variety will compound ad-infinitum and the result is a glorious breath taking diversity.
Beyond the genetic is the psychological factor which also appears to be a motivating force in creation. At that elevated level, the purpose is to split the unity into a duality with opposite poles, allowing a force of biological magnetism which impels its own dynamics. All life forms spend their life-span in a state of perpetual attraction, one gender with the other. While this attraction serves the essential biological purpose of procreation, equally it imparts humanity. The spin-off is numerous varieties of love, from the conjugal to the maternal, constituting the greatest civilizing force in nature. Imagine a world where non-sexual reproduction like that of the amoeba was universally possible without the need for attraction between mates. Procreation without love or sex would be devastating as it would produce supremely self-centred beings who would treat each other with utmost indifference, if not animosity. There would be no sharing and hedonism would grow monstrous, leading to life forms even within the same species seeking to eliminate each other in an unimaginably cold and calculating manner, much more than at present, ensuring the extinction of species.
Beyond the psychological level, there is also a metaphysical justification for bipolar sexuality. The experience of the bliss of physical union may provide a glimpse of the greater bliss of spiritual union. Physical union replicates the soul’s quest for spiritual union with the super-soul as the Yab-Yum symbolism of ‘Mahasukh’ or Great delight of Tibetan mysticism tries to illustrate.
Sexual union in nature indeed also reflects the perpetual union of the universal male and female principles at cosmic and metaphysical levels. When the Unmanifest Absolute gained self-consciousness ( as against its true nature of SAT, truth, CHIT , consciousness, ANAND, bliss) with the question ‘who am I’, opposites emerged and its unity spiralled into a dream like and imaginative diversity. The diversity sought perpetually to join again into a unity, like when we wish to wake up from a dream. The dynamics of apparent separation, which was illusory and not real, produced an even stronger dynamics of reunification, to wake up into reality. The sexuality in nature is a symptom of that dynamic.
The perfect union which preceded the dreamlike diversity of creation is symbolized as the Cosmic Hermaphrodite in Hindu mythology – the Ardhanareshwar, the Universal Essence represented as half Shiv and half Parvati his consort in a single form combining perpetually the male and female principles in one body, in a state of continuing satisfaction and bliss. Ardhnareshwar represents that perfect union, which we temporarily seek. It symbolizes the primal unity, before the inevitable falling into the wondrous slumber of duality, precipitating creation,with its separated male and female principles.
p
I navigated in expecting to react. I expected to find a prescription for androgyny.
I have been arguing with my friend from the Ordo Templi Orientis on androgyny in the degree system. Formed by early sexual abuse, my opinion is that the person disconnected from the Source, or Ground, is separated from his essential/biological/instinctual sexual impulses, and therefore may construct his sexuality without correction or confirmation from his deepest self.
Instead what I got was the most illuminating article on the “justification for bipolar sexuality” (a phrase I’m already in love with) I have ever read.
I’m probably out of the loop. Maybe there are hundreds of thousands of people writing and intelligently believing in just this perspective, but not in my world.
I plan to reread this several times as my thinking clarifies. You did a damn good job here. To me? The most personally relevant article I have read this year.
LikeLike
thanks for the appreciation – while for nature to operate with optimum results for sustaining life the bi polarity is essential and inalienable we need to remember that God or the Universal Essence is neither male nor female, sometimes one at other times the other but essentially both.
LikeLike
I can swallow that concept whole, and it goes down easy. It is when humans argue “creation” prescribes this for people, that is when my hackles go up, not because of reactions based on my filtering, but because my own impulses say different. Does that make sense?
LikeLike
If you accept (presuming you believe) that God is neither a male chauvanist nor a female cult figure but both ( minus any chauvanism or cultism) and beyond mere sexuality then to me it would .
LikeLike
I think I do. I’m a pantheist tho, so I don’t much attribute characteristics to god either way. My focus is along the conceptual lines of cosmic consciousness. I will say, if there is an illumination in my personal future on the nature of God, I don’t want my opinions or lack of opinions to cause me to miss the insights.
LikeLike
well said – opinions are like models of car, you may like vintage but out of nostalgia – only the latest (post illuminations as they come or are given to you by a guru ) models are really swift and comfortable and can take you to a destination without travails.
LikeLike
So true. I hope to trade my galopy out soon. 😉
LikeLike
Beautiful post!
LikeLike
thanks for being here
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The RunningFather Blog and commented:
I commented on this when Indrajit Rathore published it this morning: “the most illuminating article on the “justification for bipolar sexuality” (a phrase I’m already in love with) I have ever read.” But that may say more about me. Click in and read for yourself, you will not be disappointed. –Jim
LikeLike
Lovely post. But yes has to be read several times to fully understand. I am doing that.
LikeLike
kind of cerebral – do read the comments of readers – they throw light on the post. – love
LikeLike
http://jakingsley.wordpress.com/
Check me out doe.
LikeLike
The part about how the Unmanifest Absolute gained self-consciousness resonates with me. It seems to be in accord as far as it goes with my own effort to put together a Cosmogenesis:
http://www.ramaspirit.com/Uberstory-I.html
I was inspired & informed by the Shiva-Shakti poetry of Jnaneshvar, so I use that designation for the Ardhnareshwar ~ though I wasn’t familiar with that word till I read your post. I know there are countless facets of Hinduism, e.g. Shaivite vis-a-vis Vaishnava, and many limbs, branches, and offshoots of each; but I’d be interested to know if there is a significant theological or philosophical difference in which of these two wives of Shiva is given as the yin half of the cosmic allness.
You said: “Ardhnareshwar represents that perfect union, which we temporarily seek.” I wonder if you’re familiar with the alchemical teaching that an individual can attain a permanent union of soul with supersoul called *Hierosgamos*? Not surprisingly, it’s very difficult to attain; but the rare adept who succeeds is a complete Ardhnareshwar in himself, while still incarnate.
LikeLike
wow interesting
Shivs first consort was Sati – alas her father Daksha humiliated the ascetic son – in – law as he dint like his attire at a ceremony where all the gods were present – sati was so insensed that she jumped into the flames of the yagya and dissolved – shivs henchmen destroyed the arrogant daksha
then sati was reborn as Parvati and remained with him – read the Puranic story you will like it
All his consorts are called Shakti in their numerous personifications.
LikeLike
Hi John, this is a terrific tool! Personally, I prefer the version capoed at the 3d fret, in C in other words. Maybe because I listened to the three versions in order, I dunno. But I think a lot of fingerpicking stuff sounds better ca#30d&p82oe;. See you Sunday.Steve
LikeLike